We start today our list of the strangest aircrafts in history and we do
it with de Dornier DO 335 “Pfeil” which is our number 10. This aircraft whose
prototype flew for the first time in September, 1943 and was never produced in
series, was a tricky approach of Dornier to the design of a two-engine aircraft
with the characteristics of a single engine. With the tandem engine
configuration, the aerodynamic drag was considerably reduced and the asymmetry
problem in case of a single engine failure could be avoided, as it happens in
the multiengine aircrafts that have their engines under the wings.
The crux tail was designed to protect the lower rear propeller from
touching the ground during takeoff. With a maximum speed of 763 km/h at 6500 m
it was significantly over the allied fighters of the time and it was a very
promising craft. Even with a single engine it was able to reach 563 km/h, which
is exceptional for an aircraft with an empty weight of 5210 Kg.
Our position number10 of the strangest aircrafts of the history is for the DO335.
In this new entry of our blog we want to start a sweet talk speaking
about Donuts, a genuine American product like Coca Cola and in the same way as
this soft-drink, Donuts have spread over the years across the world becoming a
part our daily life.
A vivid memory of my childhood are the Donuts although, to be honest, my
mother did not allow me to eat as many as I would have liked. Obviously, with
the typical psychology of all mothers, mine exploded my passion for this sweet
to prize me when I did well, had a good mark in an exam and similar things.
This was the counterpart of the slap I received when I did something
inappropriate or wrong.
You don’t need to use your imagination to realize that, she was naturally
applying the basic rule of any relationship between parties that are not at the
same level. Namely, the carrot and stick policy.
This universal rule is applied everyday in the relationship between
company and employee although sometimes we do not stop to think about it. The
only difference is that now, the Donut is called incentive and at higher levels,
bonus.
The incentives should be something reasonable that allowed the company to
reward the good results obtained by an employee. In a small company these
incentives are discretionary by the direction board, which could lead to comparative
grievance among the employees. This is the reason why, big companies regulate
their incentives, the same as their wages or vacations.
But this strict regulation also
has its downside, because in some cases it is not easy to define the
accomplishment of the objectives, the individual or the group ones, so that over
the years the mentioned incentives turn into a complement of your payment, what
makes them loose their reward character. To speak frankly, it means that some
workers assume that they receive their salary only for attending the factory
and if the company wants them to produce, it must pay them their incentive. In
this sense, if we think that the incentives are a stimulus to improve their productivity,
the quality of work or even the commitment with the company, we will be mistaken.
It is possible that many of you are shocked by what I am saying, but if
you want to check it, you only have to go to a big company twenty minutes
before the end of the working day and you will see a row of individuals, perfectly
clean, with outdoor clothes, waiting at the stamp clock until the bell rings
and they can leave as fast as possible. And this is ok, the company allows it,
the union allows it and everybody is happy. I am not saying that everybody does, this not even that this is common, but
it happens and nobody seems to care.
The more you look up into the corporates pyramid, the easier it is to verify
the accomplishment of the objectives as these are merely economic and therefore
very easy to find. At these levels someone could think that bonuses do their
job and are the way to prize the manager’s hard work, in order to improve the company’s
results. And, again, we would be wrong.
The reason is simple. It is not necessary to be an economy expert to
realize that the financial results of a company can only be improved by one of
the following things (or both):
- The income rises
- Outlays are reduced
If we stick to a sector, such as complex as the aeronautics, rising the
income is something, that cannot be done in a short term as it implies long and
difficult negotiations with customers, that can last very long and this does
not solve the problem, as the director checks the results at the end of the
year.
So, there is only the second option left, and here is where they rumble
in. They squeeze their suppliers in order to get their bonus; they cancel any
product improvement removing any research and development budget, etc. In the
long term, this leads with any doubt, to impoverishment of the company, from a
technical point of view. But this does not worry the director because he will already
have collected his bonus and, probably, when the effects of his actions are obvious,
he will not be there anymore.
If you climb up the pyramid even more, up to the top management, the
results are not better because there you can outline the reorganization of the
company separating loss-making areas (but with a high strategic value) from
those that give profit in order to improve the short term results. Needless to
say that publically this will be explained as a restructuring oriented to market
adaptation or to increase the synergy model among the companies in the business
group and the like. But the sad reality is that the current CEO thinks that he has
two years to ensure his succulent bonus.
So, wherever we look, up or down, the panorama is devastating. This is
why I can assure you that if you are not
trapped in such work habits, or if you do something not because someone told
so, but because you believe that it is the right thing, then
you will never get that bonus
At least, to comfort you, nobody will ever take the donuts away.
A thought:
The Truth is a bird with bright colors. So that’s why, usually, it is the
first to be fired.
See you.
No comments:
Post a Comment